WATCH REVIEWS HERE! YouTube OTHER JOKES HERE! Twitter BE A FAN HERE! Facebook If you like these reviews so much, spread the word. Keep me motivated! Also, if you like them so much, why don’t you marry them?!
Tag Archives: Willem Dafoe
The Boondock Saints (2000)
I’m Figuring Some Shit Out Here
In order to continue my wicked awesome string of Boston/Massachusetts movies, I decided to review a movie that is wicked Boston that was requested by my friend and coworker Captain Hook, wicked lovah of all things hookah. The problem with reviewing this movie stems from the fact that it’s wicked populah, and that I’ve already seen this movie twice and didn’t think much of it. It’s so populah that I purchased the movie based on the raving reviews that friends had given me for it, but still never saw anything special to this movie. And, according to the reviews I’ve seen for this movie, I seem to agree not with the general population that gave it 93% good reviews, but with the professional critics that gave it a measly 17%. And that makes me a professional critic! So, when I sat down to watch this movie for the third time (remembering next to nothing from my previous viewings), I decided to try to pay special attention and try to figure out how this movie got so wicked populah. Let’s see what happened in my review of The Boondock Saints, written and directed by Troy Duffy, and starring Sean Patrick Flanery, Norman Reedus, Willem Dafoe, David Della Rocco, Billy Connolly, Bob Marley (not that Bob Marley, apparently), David Ferry, Brian Mahoney, Carlo Rota, and Ron Jeremy. And yes, I will stop affecting that accent.
Two Irish stereotypes, Connor (Sean Patrick Flanery) and Murphy McManus (Norman Reedus), get into a bar brawl with three Russian mobster stereotypes which winds up with two of the mobsters dead. FBI Special Agent Paul Smecker (Willem Dafoe) is called in to investigate. Despite the Boston cop stereotypes surrounding him, he is able to figure out exactly what happened. Connor and Murphy turn themselves in and are let off, the deaths being ruled self-defense. The two brothers mistake water falling on their faces for a message from God that they should be killing evil-doers. With the help of their friend, errand boy for the Italian mob stereotypes Rocco (David Della Rocco), they set off to kill anyone that does naughty things, with Smecker ever on their heels.
It’s official: I still don’t get it. I’m not saying it’s a bad movie, but I don’t know why anyone pays this any special type of attention. It’s roughly the same quality as any other dumb action movie. It’s fun while it lasts, but it’s instantly forgettable. The story is subpar vigilante fare. There’s no real good reason that these guys decide to start killing people; they just get hit in the head with some water while remembering a sermon they heard earlier and decide God talked to them. It’s roughly on par with Bill Paxton seeing a bowling trophy sparkle and thinking that God was saying they should kill people. I want to say to anyone that thinks God is talking to them: he probably doesn’t want you to kill people. I haven’t spoken to God and am only basing that on that thing in that book he told some dudes to write, but I think it’s the safest thing to assume. After the revelation that they should become vigilantes, that’s all the movie is. Two, three, or four guys going places and shooting bad people. The more interesting stuff in the movie all involved Smecker. They weren’t that much more interesting as just a really good detective figuring out what happened in each scene, but it was slightly more interesting. One of them had an interesting bit of cinematography when Smecker was describing the scene from inside the scene, but this only happened once. The movie begins and ends with some pointless jargon running through the credits. The opening credits show a bunch of random scenes involving the two brothers, but had nothing in them we needed to see and I felt they just wasted my time. The end credits had scenes of people being interviewed about what they thought about what the Saints were doing, which I also didn’t need to see. The ending credit ones seemed to be showing the mixed viewpoints on how people would feel about real vigilante’s, perhaps to attempt to add a message about whether it’d be right or wrong to kill bad people, but the movie itself doesn’t take that standpoint, so why bother? The movie is only about the brothers being beloved for what they’re doing. So much so that even the best cop on the force sides with what they’re doing. Generally a dumb action movie would replace good writing with good action, but that’s not really here either. Most of the action is broken up with scenes of Smecker talking about the action, and the rest of it is not much more spectacular than two guys standing in one place and firing bullets at people. Those people die. The end. So you’ve got an interesting idea but poor writing, mediocre action, and a lot of time wasting, so what do you get? Apparently, a cult hit.
The performances are fine enough, but I’d say the characters are all poorly written. There’s one character in this movie that isn’t just a stereotype given physical form. Not in an offensive way or anything, just in a one dimensional way. Both Sean Patrick Flanery and Norman Reedus played their parts well, but they were written very one dimensionally. David Della Rocco didn’t play much on the Italian stereotype, but he still only had the one, uber-manic character trait to him. And he got pretty annoying. Billy Connolly had what I assumed would’ve been an interesting character, but they couldn’t allow those shenanigans so they didn’t put him in the movie very much. Willem Dafoe’s character was the only one I found that interesting. He was gay, but not stereotypically so. He even calls the guy he wakes up with a fag for wanting to cuddle. He was the classic “best cop on the force” but had the whole gay thing going on as well, and was conflicted about his feelings on the Saints. I also think he made a pretty convincing woman. Not a “pretty” woman, but a convincing one!
Statistically, the greater majority of people will probably disagree with me when I say I don’t care for this movie. It’s not painful to watch or even bad, but it’s poorly written with most of the characters having only one dimension to their character, the action is nothing special, but the performances are mostly good. If you’re really into vigilantes, or just really into Jesus telling people to kill other people, maybe you’ll like it. I personally require either a good story or cool action from my movies, and perhaps even a combination of both. Without those, this movie’s okay, but forgettable. Boondock Saints gets “It is your corrupt we claim” out of “Hey fuck-ass. Gimme a beer.”
Let’s get these reviews more attention, people. Post reviews on your webpages, tell your friends, do some of them crazy Pinterest nonsense. Whatever you can do to help my reviews get more attention would be greatly appreciated. You can also add me on FaceBook (Robert T. Bicket) and Twitter (iSizzle). Don’t forget to leave me some comments. Your opinions and constructive criticisms are always appreciated.
John Carter (2012)
You Are Ugly, But You Are Beautiful!
The inspiration behind seeing today’s movie is going to be hard to explain, mainly because I had no inspiration to see this movie whatsoever. I saw the trailers and thought, “Yup. Looks like a movie.” And that was it. I saw a couple of people on Facebook talk about how great the movie was, but I would not be swayed. One friend asked me if I wanted to see it, and I said no, but probably would’ve gone anyway had I not been at work. When my roommate got a free ticket and offered to pay half of mine, I decided the universe was telling me to see this movie already. Let’s see how it did in my review of John Carter, based on a novel by Edgar Rice Burroughs, written by Andrew Stanton, Mark Andrews, and Michael Chabon, directed by Andrew Stanton, and starring Taylor Kitsch, Lynn Collins, Dominic West, Mark Strong, Willem Dafoe, Ciaran Hinds, Samantha Morton, Thomas Haden Church, James Purefoy, Bryan Cranston, and Daryl Sabara.
John Carter (Taylor Kitsch) of Virginia has died suddenly. When he fell ill, he had sent for his nephew, Edgar “Ned” Rice Burroughs (Daryl Sabara), but he arrives postmortem, but is given John’s diary by his butler and told that only he was supposed to read it. His first thought is to release this book, slap his name on it, make millions, and then get a movie made about it with the guy that ruined Gambit in the Wolverine movie, but then his second thought is to read it. It details a story about John looking for gold and finding a cave with a pasty bald dude who tries to kill him. John shoots the pasty dude and gets transported away by the dude’s medallion. He wakes up in a desert slightly different than the one he was already in and finds himself able to jump really high. He meets a giant, green, four-armed creature called a Thark who is named Tars Tarkas (Willem Dafoe). Eventually, a couple of airships commanded by by the ruthless Sab Than (Dominic West) pursues a ship carrying Princess Dejah Thoris (Lynn Collins) into Thark territory. Sab Than has been given a powerful weapon called the “Ninth Ray” by the pasty bald Therns and is pursuing Dejah because she is trying to escape marrying him to save her people. John uses his new powers to save her and bring down the majority of the ships, though Sab is able to escape. Through Dejah, he finds that he was transported to Mars. John resolves to get back to Earth, Dejah resolves to get John to defeat Sab, and Tars Tarkas’ secret daughter Sola (Samantha Morton) resolves to follow them around and be relatively ineffectual.
This movie perplexed me. I didn’t find the movie hard to follow as the story is not really that complicated. What perplexes me about the movie is that it’s inexplicably boring. But, because I’m writing a review, I must find a way to “explic” it. It’s strange to me because it has all the components of a really cool, really interesting, and/or really fun action movie, but it never comes to fruition. The story is an interesting enough concept. I like the idea of a human being transported to Mars where he turns into a superhero because he comes from a place with higher gravity, allowing him to jump higher and hit harder on Mars. I don’t really get behind the idea that he’d EVER want to return to Earth, though. His family died long before the movie started, so he didn’t need to get back because of that. He did have a cave full of gold waiting for him, but you know what a cave full of gold can’t buy you? Fucking super powers! And you want a reason to hang out with your super powers on Mars? How about the sexy as Martian woman you just met? Sure, their romance came out of nowhere, but who cares? She’s hot! Their relationship never really worked for me. He saves her life with his superpowers, but all she’s concerned about is getting him to save her city. A while later, he helps her up off the ground and you see that they’re crushing on each other now. That’s how he wins her? Helping her stand up? Neither one of them had given the other any reason to like the other before that, so it must’ve been his ability to help her off the ground. She was constantly trying to trick him into helping her people, and he was completely unconcerned with helping her people. No reason whatsoever. Though this story had elements that should entertain me, it never really did. One of the few parts that gained some interest was the Thark tradition of letting loose some babies and having mother pounce on them and fight over them to gain motherhood. So, with a story that never catches your attention, you’d have to rely on the action to do it. There was lots of action, but none of it interested me, and I’m still a little curious about why. There was a guy or two with superpowers, some sword fighting, some giant creatures, but it all eventually devolved into people randomly swinging swords and blue blood flying around a little. That’s about it. It could have been the look, I suppose. Almost every setting was identical, or not far removed. It goes from desert, to desert, to desert with some water, back to desert, then ends up in a city … surrounded by desert. I’m sure that’s what Mars looks like, but Mars looks boring. The CG all worked really well though. The creatures looked like they were talking, animated like real creatures, they had personalities, weight, and lighting to all look really good.
I had been trying to figure out where I knew Taylor Kitsch from every time I saw the trailers. I wasn’t able to figure it out until the actual movie started, but then it worked against him because Gambit was my favorite X-Man and he ruined him. He did fine enough in this movie, but I didn’t like the character because he looked the superpowered gift horse right in the mouth. He did introduce himself as, “Carter. John Carter,” and I’m pretty sure no one’s ever actually introduced themselves that way. I was a big fan of Lynn Collins from her work in her own hotness from the moment I saw her. I didn’t pay much attention to her performance though. I did get supremely irritated by her character though. It takes her the greater majority of the movie to stop being a selfish bitch. She’s basically told that Sab will kill her people unless she marries him … so she runs off. That means he’ll kill your people! You care enough to try to get a guy with no interest in your people to help out, but you could’ve just married the guy in the beginning and not been a selfish bitch. She figures it out about two hours later and does it, but now John loves her and stops it from happening. Everyone else in the movie was either forgettable, a voice of a CG creature, or both. Most of the characters in the movie made so little impact on me that I genuinely found myself much more interested in what was happening with the giant, alien, dog-like creature called Woola. I loved that little guy, mostly (I’m sure) because he reminded me a lot of my own dog, Jabba. He had an oversized head, big sloppy tongue, cheerful demeanor, and tendency to lie down and go to sleep at random. The similarities were damaged some by the fact that the dog could run super fast instead of running for a few seconds, getting bored, and going to sleep. But so disinteresting were the human characters that, in a battle between a large army of aliens and John Carter, with Woola helping out a little, I found myself ignoring what John was doing and looking to make sure Woola was okay.
John Carter is a movie that seemed to have everything, but actually offered next to nothing. The story was in interesting idea that didn’t deliver. The action had all the ingredients but turned out bland. The performances were fine, but all of their characters were overshadowed by a dog. The CG was great, but the settings all looked the same and were visually boring. Like I said, this movie is inexplicably boring, but it’s been explicked to the best of my ability. I would say this movie is a waste of two hours plus, so I would recommend you steer clear of coughing up theater prices for it. When it comes to RedBox, that might be the time to give it a look, but you’ll also do well to avoid it there as well. John Carter gets “To those who seek the solace of eternity” out of “When I saw you, I believed it was a sign … that something new can come into this world.”
Let’s get these reviews more attention, people. Post reviews on your webpages, tell your friends, do some of them crazy Pinterest nonsense. Whatever you can do to help my reviews get more attention would be greatly appreciated. You can also add me on FaceBook (Robert T. Bicket) and Twitter (iSizzle). Don’t forget to leave me some comments. Your opinions and constructive criticisms are always appreciated.
Robert Reviews Stuff 